iDesign @ UCI

Welcome Message To New Students

Interested in Origins?
Join the club.


Mission Statement

FAQ

Organization


MISSION STATEMENT:

iDesign Club at UCI seeks to foster scientific discussions regarding the origins of life and the universe. Theories such as Darwinian evolution, intelligent design, and creationism will be critically analyzed.


FAQ:

Q: WHAT IS THIS CLUB ABOUT?

Origins! We are interested in discussing alternative theories to the origins of biological structures. While the current mainstream theory in academia is Darwinian evolution, we would also like to discuss other viable ideas, such as intelligent design.

Q: WHO CAN BE A MEMBER OF THIS CLUB?

Anybody! Students of Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Engineering, Anthropology, and Philosophy may especially find this club intriguing. However, you do not need to have a science background to be an effective member of this club.

Q: WHEN AND WHERE ARE CLUB MEETINGS?

Please check blog entries for time and place.

Q: WHAT IS THE MEMBERSHIP FEE?

Nothing! There are no membership dues.

Q: IS THIS CLUB BIASED TOWARDS ONE SPECIFIC THEORY OF ORIGINS?

Perhaps. Ponder the name of this club. This club is ideologically the mirror of another club at UCI, the Students for Science and Skepticism. However, our main goal is to give a balanced view of the controversy regarding the origins of life so that students can come to an informed conclusion themselves.

Q: WHAT DOES THE LETTER "i" STAND FOR IN iDESIGN?

Good question -- the answer is intelligent.

Q: WHERE IS THE CLUB CONSTITUTION?

We adhere to the minimum constitution that was provided by the Dean of Students. In the future, we plan to draft a comprehensive constitution and bylaws.

Q: IS iDESIGN AFFILIATED WITH ANY ORGANIZATION?

No. However, we are friends with the IDEA Center


ORGANIZATION:

PRESIDENT:
Arthur
Information and Computer Science

VICE PRESIDENT:
Brian
Biology / English

DIRECTOR:
Andrew
English / Economics



Friday, March 03, 2006

2nd Law Of Thermodynamics

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics has been used for quite some time to argue that order cannot come from disorder. Granville Sewell, a Texas A&M mathematician, brings the issue back on the table in this PDF article and slides (HT: Uncommon Descent). Some of the material in the article is also found in his "The Numerical Solution of Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations, Second Edition" textbook. Here's a clip from the article:
When you look at the individual steps in the development of life, Darwin’s explanation is difficult to disprove, because some selective advantage can be imagined in almost anything. Like every other scheme designed to violate the second law, it is only when you look at the net result that it becomes obvious it won’t work.

Posted by Art at 1:31 PM

6 Comments:

Blogger Doctor Logic said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
3/03/2006 9:51 PM
Blogger Doctor Logic said...
Um, this Sewell guy is a total nutball.

His arguments are refuted by the simplest of thermodynamic engines. If he were correct, there would be no gemstones, and it would be impossible for our kids to tidy their rooms!

Oops! Scratch that. It is impossible for our kids to tidy their rooms.
3/03/2006 9:53 PM
Blogger Ed Darrell said...
It's amazing that you guys at UCI trot out the oldest and most wrong stuff.

Since Dover, are you really that desperate? Have none of you ever studied any thermodynamics in class? Do you seriously misunderstand science that much?
3/04/2006 3:22 AM
Blogger Steven said...
I wish everyone who argues that entropy is a measure of disorder would take a statistical mechanics class. If you study models with long range interactions the analogy between entropy and disorder falls apart quickly.
3/04/2006 10:56 PM
Blogger Art said...
Hi Ed,

Since Dover, are you really that desperate? Have none of you ever studied any thermodynamics in class? Do you seriously misunderstand science that much?

I studied thermodynamics in the Physics series (for engineers), but I haven't taken a stat mech class like Steven has suggested. Maybe Steven can elaborate on his comment.

When an argument like Sewell's appears in the appendix of a math textbook, it deserves at least a little consideration.
3/08/2006 5:28 PM
Blogger Ed Darrell said...
Why would an article unrelated to math, in an appendix to a math book, merit any consideration? What sort of odd, counterproductive precedent would that set?
3/09/2006 11:20 PM

Post a Comment

<< Return To Main Blog


iDESIGN BLOGROLL:

The Design Paradigm
Design Watch
Creation-Evolution Headlines
Telic Thoughts
Uncommon Descent
ID the Future
ID Plus
CreationEvolutionDesign
Evolution News
Dualistic Dissension
ID in the UK
ID Update
Intelligently Sequenced


PRO-DESIGN SITES:

Access Research Network
IDEA Center
UCSD IDEA Club
ISCID


PRO-EVOLUTION SITES:

Panda's Thumb
Talk Origins
Students for Science and Skepticism at UCI
NAS: Science and Creationism


PRO-CREATION SITES:

Answers in Genesis
Institute for Creation Research
A.E. Wilder Smith
Reasons to Believe
Baraminology News
CreationWiki


OTHER INTERESTING SITES:

American Scientific Affiliation
Richard Sternberg


ANTEATER LINKS:

University of California, Irvine
New University
Irvine Review
School of Biological Sciences
School of Medicine
School of Physical Sciences
Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science
Henry Samueli School of Engineering
UCI Athletics
UCI Alumni Association


BLOG ARCHIVES:

June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
April 2007

Copyright © iDesign at UCI 2005. The views presented in this web site are our own. By using this site, you signify that iDesign at UCI is not liable for anything. Site maintained by Arthur Asuncion. Template last modified June 15, 2005.

Powered by Blogger